Sunday, January 31, 2016

Maus, Animals, and Race

One of the interesting bits of background about Spiegelman's text is that the mice were not originally drawn quite so cartoonishly.  Instead, Spiegelman drew them in a manner that was more realistic/ human-like, clearly based in part on the famous photographs of concentration camp survivors taken by photographers such as Margaret Bourke-White.


Original sketch for Maus

Bourke-White photo from LIFE magazine of liberated prisoners

With this in mind, it's interesting to speculate about just why Spiegelman chose to revise his original mice into something more cartoonish.  Does it have something to do with the icon and identification, as McCloud would have them?  Is Spiegelman's decision to portray the Jews as mice problematic because it fundamentally essentializes race and trades in stereotype?  Or, as we will see more clearly in Book II of Maus, is he trying to suggest something more subversive about race and national identity--and the combined ridiculousness and danger of racism?  Does Spiegelman's choice to use animals in Maus encourage or forestall identification, in your opinion? Would you have responded differently to the mice if they were drawn in the manner of the more realistic, anthropomorphic sketch above?

Another important aspect of the Jews-as-mice, Germans-as-cats, Poles-as-pigs metaphor is its historical accuracy in terms of the stereotypes in currency before and during the war, as well as the preoccupation that many Germans had with whether the Jews were a race.

Beginning during the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, roughly coterminous with the Enlightenment's investment in creating scientific and racial taxonomies, anxiety about Jewish racial difference came to center around the Jewish body. Many Europeans became obsessed with the idea that Jews were members of an inferior, non-white race. Part of this obsession centered around the idea that Jews had distinguishable physical characteristics that rendered them decidedly other.
Sadly, many stereotypes found their way into caricature.

 

Above, you can see early examples of Jewish caricature that focus on supposed physical differences of Jews, including large noses and ears, oversized feet, and talon-like nails.

Later Nazi caricature traded in similar stereotypes of Jewish physical difference. (see below)




During this period of anti-Semitic propaganda, Jews were often likened to vermin, particularly mice and rats.



The Nazi film, Der Ewige Jude (The Eternal, or Wandering, Jew), one of the most disturbing anti-Semitic propaganda pieces, featured scenes that juxtaposed "typical" wandering Jew with images of rats and mice overrunning various parts of the globe.  This image (a still of the rats can be seen below) suggested that, like vermin, Jews spread chaos and disease, literal and metaphorical, wherever they went.


For more on anti-Semitic stereotypes, you might check out resources such as Sander Gilman's work on The Jew's Body, this book on Racial Science in Hitler's New Europe, or this book on Nazi propaganda.

For more early sketches and background on the creation of Maus, take a look at Meta-Maus, Spiegelman's behind-the-scenes account of the creation of his work.

9 comments:

  1. After reading your insight on Jews as rats, I don't know how I feel about it. I really thought Maus was tastefully done but when given the twist of the stereotypes and history it almost seems offensive that they would be rats. However, I think his twist on the rats is really cute and irresistibly likable. If he were to do the book with a different animal representing the Jews I am not sure if there is a specific type... I really enjoyed the insight of the rats, thought!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I'm looking at a panel with a dead German (50) and I don't feel like I think I ought to. I see there's blood trickling from his mouth but I don't feel like I'm looking at a dead person. I think the less cartoonish mice better communicate emotion than the cartoons. Perhaps this is a bad habit, a holdover from living in a world where cartoons don't equal emotional gravitas.

    ReplyDelete
  3. It is definitely weird that they are mice in this book. At first I thought it was just away to appeal to a younger audience, but the tone of the story is far to serious and complicated for small children. Then I thought it could be just a way to add some flare, make the story more interesting somehow, but the fact that their mice plays no role in the story. They even refer to themselves as humans. Plus there is so much untaped comedy; mice puns, cheese references, anything...

    This history definitely brought up some concerns, but now that I think about it, noting about the story portrayed Jews in a negative light at all. There is no reason to think Spieglman meant to be callous with his portrayal of the jews.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I feel like the depiction of Jews as mice has everything to do with the stereotypes of Jews and the Germans referring to them as vermin. I believe the same is true of Germans and Cats, whose roles were to catch the mice, and the Poles who were depicted as pigs, who often betrayed the Jews when they ran out of money, or worse, just because.

    I feel like making the animals more cartoonish had a lot to do with iconography and being able to identify with these characters as beings rather than animals. I have previously stated that I feel this comic is less a "Holocaust tale" and more a tale of the relationship between Artie, Vladak, Anja and family as told through the acquisition of this story of the Holocaust.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I definitely agree with and believe that the Jews being depicted as mice was and is extremely intentional. Society at the time definitely dehumanized the Jews, treating them as rat, and if the Germans were cats, it makes all the more sense, as the Germans essentially hunted them down, as cats do with mice.

    I think that one of the reasons Spiegelman might have made the mice more cartoonish is because it's already a rather morbid idea to have the Jews as mice, it would be another to make them as morose as they seemed. I also think there is more leeway with cartoons; it becomes less historically accurate in the sense that the author can do more with the characters.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Some very interesting points here! Just to clarify: By using animals and linking to this history of anti-Semitism, Spiegelman was not trying to be anti-Semitic himself, but instead to point out something about how dangerous and ridiculous racial thinking is and can be.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I believe that everything that was done in Maus was done intentionally. I actually like his original depiction more, I think it added more to the story. The cartoonized interpretation was good as well, but I think the original would have added a little bit more realism to the story.

    ReplyDelete
  8. By using the more cartoonish mice Spiegelman made them more relateable somehow. If they were depicted in a more realistic manner it would perhaps be difficult to have a personal connection with the characters. By making them almost cute it slightly downplays the horror they are experiencing and allows the reader to connect with the character. Rather than letting the horror of the events lead the story, this causes the story to remain focused on the characters.

    The choices of animals were definitely stereotypical and not just done on a whim. The Holocaust even evokes similarities to a cat and mouse game, on a horrific scale.

    ReplyDelete
  9. The decision to represent the characters as animals is a very interesting one that at first glance, seems to be done for distinguishing the comic. However, it's clear as you read that this was done very purposefully. Spiegelman chooses the animal that the Nazis actually used as a symbol to dehumanize an entire population of innocent Jews. By doing this the hatred and unimaginable horror of the holocaust is starkly laid out in a way that using human characters may not achieve. The cartoonish aspect makes the characters more universal and the reader feels a different level of empathy for the mice.

    ReplyDelete