Hi all,
Pardon me, my
page numbers are off.
I have no sense of what interests you so I decided on a buffet approach. I suppose you might comment on whatever resonates with you.
The Veil:
Marjane’s stay in Austria has come to an end. She puts on her veil and
comments, “so much for my individual and social liberties…I needed so badly to
go home” (91). Marjane is clearly aware of the freedoms she’s giving up. Why
does she decide to go home? What does this imply about the relationship between
coming of age, independence, and family? What’s the significance of the veil?
The Return: One
way of reading this chapter might be by using space as an organizing tool.
Marjane moves and comments on the environment to which she has returned. How do
these spaces compare to her memories of them as a child? To similar spaces in
Austria? Marjane has a crisis of experience in this chapter. Her father
catchers her up on the events she’s missed which results in Marjane feeling
like her “Viennese misadventures seemed like little anecdotes of no importance”
(103). In a coming of age story, a protagonist
who can’t make sense of their experience isn’t quite on the right path. Marjane
will have to come to terms or salvage that experience at some point. I’m making
a note, we’ll see.
The Joke:
Marjane is visited by her family and friends and visits her childhood friend
Kia. The visits, like the spaces of the last chapter, offer an opportunity to
explore difference, particularly the difference between reality and people’s
perceptions. What’s going on here? One of Marjane’s criticisms of her friends
is that they are “ready to get married at the drop of a hat” (105). What’s
marriage got to do with Marjane’s development/identity
formation/self-actualization? After visiting her childhood friend Kia, Marjane
says, “That day, I learned something essential: we can only feel sorry for
ourselves when our misfortunes are still supportable…once this limit is
crossed, the only way to bear the unbearable is to laugh at it” (112). What
does she mean? What does this lesson signify about her development? Do you
agree with her “essential” knowledge?
Marjane’s
comment resonates with Camus’ “The Myth of Sisyphus” and notions of the absurd,
suicide, and coping philosophies. How interested are you or how appropriate is
it to read Marjane as an absurd hero?
Skiing: Satrapi
might have called this chapter “The Ski Trip,” so that it fit with the rest of
the chapter titles. Is there anything to be made of this? Marjane spends a lot
of time watching a Japanese show called “Oshin.” Marjane says she learned later “that Oshin
was in fact a geisha and since her profession didn’t suit Islamic morals, the
director of the channel had decided that she’d be a hairdresser…It was believable
because Oshin and her courtesan friends spent their time making chignons”
(114). This instance suggests something about the relationship between what an
object is and morals. This comment suggests rhetoric is epistemic. The
troubling implication is that a thing can pass as a thing it is not because
someone on a moral high horse said so. How might this contribute to Marjane’s
difficulties? Where else does that sort of logic at work in Persepolis? Marjane attempts suicide and
has some surreal experiences, which might interest folks reading Marjane in an
absurd tradition, but is ultimately unsuccessful. Her failure is chalked up “divine
intervention” (119). From divine intervention Satrapi moves to a makeover, some
conspicuous consumption, a fitness regimen, and destiny. We’ve been interested in
the veil but Satrapi introduces an alternative type of clothing identification –
the “sophisticated woman.” What’s the relationship between clothes and identity
formation? If the veil can be read as a sign of oppression how does Marjane’s
new wardrobe operate differently?
The Exam: In
this chapter Marjane meets Reza at a party. The visual style changes to black silhouettes
in a white room. Is there anything to be made of this change? Marjane worries
she won’t pass the religious exam but luckily is interviewed by “a truly
religious man.” That statement suggests that Satrapi advances some logic of
religion in Persepolis. What is it?
The Makeup: The
conflict in this chapter results from Marjane falsely accusing a man of lewd
behavior. How does this chapter work narratively? Put another way, I expect
that we agree with Marjane’s grandmother, why? Beyond the logic of her
thinking, it seems to me that Satrapi characterizes Reza, Marjane, and her
grandmother in such a way that the reader is conditioned to side against Reza
and Marjane.
The Convocation:
On pages 52 and 53 of Understanding
Comics, McCloud positions a number of artists on chart based on their
artistic style. Where would you position Satrapi on McCloud’s chart based on
the visual style of this chapter? What does Satrapi’s visual style do differently that other styles
do not? Do you find her style effective? Deficient? We also get a picture of
resistance in this chapter. How does Marjane’s resistance compare to other
types of resistance in Persepolis?
Any meaningful implications?
The Socks: In
this chapter I’m interested in the impact of morals on art (see Oshin in “Skiing”),
Marjane’s run (a disembodied voice, a ridiculous double standard, the
insistence of viewing the female body with the male gaze), the notion that “everything
was a pretext to arrest us” (148) and the implications of that sort of logic on
psychology and behavior. In addition to these instances one might discuss the
lack of any words for a number of pages (McCloud might inform your reading).
The Wedding: One
might be discuss the images of Marjane in jail, the Marjane Reza married, the
Marjane Marjane thinks she is, and Marjane’s relationship to Reza. What do you
think of their relationship? What sort of relationships do you compare it to?
There are ideas about marriage unbounded by text and ideas about marriage put
forward by Persepolis (the
relationship between Marjane’s parents vs the relationship between Zozo and her
husband), what’s the significance of it all?
The Satellite: In
this chapter one might draw conclusions about political conscience, education, and
technology. You might investigate Marjane’s development as it relates to these
facets of life.
The End:
Marjane, “leaving for good,” says, “The goodbyes were much less painful than
ten years before when I embarked for Austria: There was no longer a war, I was no
longer a child, my mother didin’t faint and my grandma was there, happily…happily,
because since the night of September 9, 1994, I only saw her again once, during
the Iranian New Year in March 1995. She died January 4, 1996…Freedom had a
price” (187). Paradoxically, Marjane depicts her grandmother crying. It seems
that Marjane has done the same resignification that Oshin’s channel director
did – she’s insisting on making a thing a thing it was not. What does this
suggest about narrative revision, coming of age, making sense of the world? Can
you construct a logic to Persepolis which
applies differently to Marjane and the channel director? How might this ending
fit in line with Camus’ smiling Sisyphus and the absurd?
First of all, I absolutely love your post! You have such great insight on the pressing subjects.
ReplyDeleteI am choosing to discuss the veil... I choose this particularly because my family is from Iran and has moved and stayed all over but always goes back to Iran knowing what they are giving up. When my aunt was able to come to America frequently, she never wore her veil! She loved her freedom and rights in America and took advantage of it when she could. But, she always goes back to Iran. Iran is their home, and if I were to put myself in Marjane's shoes I would want to go back home. Imagine if we had to flee America, we would definitely want to come back because that is what we know best and other cultures were disgracing Iranians and still do, so she felt out of place. I am only half Iranian and am very much against there customs, particularily because I was born in America and am used to this culture, but sometimes I hear people hate on the race in general and it sort of infuriates me, much like it did Marjane. Granted, most arguments are valid but not everyone over there is a terrorist or criminal. It is evident that I am not fully American considering my dark complexion, so fitting in as a girl was always a struggle for me growing up as well.
I too would like to discuss the veil. There was an individual in my Interpersonal Communications course who wore a veil which she loved, which is rather contrary to that of what Marisa is saying. She described her religion as beautiful, and said that she shielded her hair in order to honor her image, to say that she is beautiful without her hair being seen and that she would like to save it for her husband or significant other in the future. I personally thought that it was really interesting, and a nice way to look at it. She was very comfortable with her religion and with the veil, which was nice. However, I understand the freedom of not wearing one. It's a cultural decision, and to some it means something of value and to others it can be something that is seen as sexist.
ReplyDelete